The “Kriminologisches Journal” (KrimJ) is a quarterly scientific journal which is published by Beltz-Juventa. The journal features original scientific articles, discussion papers, practice and research reports on criminological theory and practice in German and English language. The thematic focus is on critical approaches to the structures and measures of social control bodies. All manuscripts undergo selective editorial and peer-review assessment prior to acceptance for publication. The peer-review process is strictly anonymous.
The “Kriminologisches Journal” is available both in print and online. Single issues and subscriptions are available at Beltz Juventa.
Issue 3/2018
Issue 3/2018
Content
Special Contributions in celebration of 50 years Kriminologisches Journal
Abschaffung der Gefängnisse (German)
Prison abolition
Sebastian Scheerer
When critical criminology emerged in Germany (in 1969), its prison discourse was strictly treatment oriented. In the 1980s, the dominance of abolitionist positions disappointed many practicioners, but contemporary prison trends give reason to believe that it might be both preferable and more realistic to abolish punitive segregation altogether than to improve the prison system up to a point where it can be said to meet the requirements of the Nelson Mandel rules, i.e., human rights standards.
Prävention. Praktiken, Kritiken und Leerstellen (German)
Prevention - practices, critiques, and blank spaces
Dirk Lampe
This article gives a short introduction into the history of prevention in Germany in the last four decades. Based on the description of selected debates and developments it is shown how prevention became the central strategy in crime fighting discourses and practices, which approaches to crime prevention are currently dominant, and which critiques and arguments against these prophylactic tendencies have been brought forward by (critical) criminologist. Drawing on the recent developments towards preemptive and Big Data-based prevention programs some blank spaces within the academic discourse on (crime) prevention are mentioned.
Punitivität (German)
Punitivity
Bernd Dollinger
Punitivity is an outstanding focus of criminology, particularly of its critical branch. It exacts analyses of political and institutional penal rationalitites, which have to be discussed time and again on a theoretical and empirical basis. These analyses have to locate themselves between the poles of in-depth analyses versus global assessments, and between local particularities of punishment versus all-encompassing transformations. Additionally, the question of normative (counter-)positioning has to be posed always anew.
Strafrecht (German)
Criminal Law
Jens Puschke
The present paper takes a look at the legal structure of German criminal law. Criminal law is described as an anachronism that nevertheless strengthens and expands its hegemonic position. More recently than ever, criminal law has been used as a means of solving social problems and as part of an extensive security architecture. It is critically presented how criminal law tends to include numerous areas of life. Connected to social perceptions of an alleged immediate and omnipresent danger it becomes part of a conception of prevention. Against this background, judicial and criminological research perspectives are examined.
Ausnahmezustände (German)
States of emergency
Andrea Kretschmann & Aldo Legnaro
States of Emergency are modes of governance: they make it possible to transform a democracy into a dictatorship, as is shown in historical examples, and in democracies they bring about comprehensive securitisation, which can, however, succeed even without a state of emergency. In any case, the democratic mode of government is changing, which proves the productivity of both the state of emergency and all measures of securitisation.
Discussion Papers
Kritik der Versicherheitlichung: Thesen zur (sozialwissenschaftlichen) Sicherheitsforschung (German)
Critique of securitization: Theses on (social science) security research
Jan Wehrheim
Security research as applied or basic research is part of what has been discussed in the social sciences as securitization. Four theses attempt to critically classify the ambivalent role of the social sciences in the interdisciplinary field of research.
Warum Leute wie Rainer Wendt nicht an der Universität sprechen sollten (German)
Why people like Rainer Wendt should not speak at universities
Bernd Belina
Based on a recent debate around a cancelled appearance by Rainer Wendt, chairman of the Deutsche Polizeigewerkschaft (DPolG - German Police Union), at Goethe University Frankfurt, it is argued why the decision to not let Rainer Wendt speak at the university was right.
Conference Reports
„Kriminologie des Visuellen. Ordnungen des Sehens und der Sichtbarkeit im Kontext von Kriminalitätskontrolle und Sicherheitspolitiken“. Bericht über die Tagung des Zentrums für interdisziplinäre Forschung der Universität Bielefeld und der Gesellschaft für interdisziplinäre wissenschaftliche Kriminologie vom 22.-23. März 2018 in Bielefeld (Thane)
„Kritische Kriminologie und Soziale Arbeit im Dialog“.Bericht über den Kriminologischen Fachtag der Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften am 16. Mai 2018 in Hamburg (Kühne/Schlepper)
Book reviews
Svea Steckhan: Rauschkontrolleure und das Legalitätsprinzip. Polizeiliche Perspektiven zu Drogen und Drogenkriminalität (Maltsev)
Leon Hempel, Marie Bartels und Thomas Markwart: Aufbruch ins Unversicherbare. Zum Katastrophendiskurs der Gegenwart (Legnaro)